Does American Idol Produce Real Stars?

It’s like a grand experiment, this “American Idol”. It starts with a thesis: “There is an identifiable “X” factor that contributes to super-stardom”. Then, the experiment, in two phases: First, a small group of industry insiders winnow through a diverse group using their experience to discern “American Idol” possibilities, then over several weeks the audiences of “American Idol” choose who think would make a good star. This seems to have the making of solid science, allowing some margin for cranks on the internet boosting the voting process, but in the five years since “American Idol” has debuted, has it succeeded in producing a star capable of unassisted flight. And what of the secondary purported effect of an “American Idol” appearance, which states that just making it into the bottom five assures you success? Let’s review.

Season One’s “American Idol” winner, Kelly Clarkson, may provide some of the most interesting data on the “American Idol” experiment. The success of her “Idol” sponsored recording contract, which every winner gets, was awesome at first with a number one debut on the Billboard charts. In terms of critical reviews, Kelly was often treated as a candy coated TV exec’s vision of a wanna-be star, not in contempt of her phenomenal vocal abilities though. Despite her obvious talents, the music industry, particularly the press, was not ready to accept Kelly as one of their own, instead she was branded a creation of television, the medium of “American Idol”, a cross-over star.

In an effort to be taken “seriously” Kelly walked away from her “American Idol” contract and went on to produce the album symbolically titled “Break Away”. While not having the advantage of the “American Idol” hype machine behind it, the more independent “Break Away” still managed to land within the top-ten and better yet received Grammy nominations and awards symbolizing the industries final acceptance, four years later, of the “American Idol” refugee as one of their own.

Runner up Justin Guarini, on the other hand did not have as much success. At first, after losing to Clarkson in the “American Idol” finale, Justin seemed to be nearly as big a part of the post-“American Idol” marketing wave. The producers seemed determined to prove as many successes as possible and Guarini would have made a logical choice to come out of the “American Idol” halo with star potential intact. His first album, also on the “American Idol” label, opened at a disappointing number twenty and quickly fell off the charts with little critical or listener praise. Unlike Kelly’s autonomous departure from the “American Idol” contract, Justin Guarini quickly found himself abandoned by the Idol producers. He has continued to make music through independent labels, but his success is hardly notable.

Of the rest of the season one alum some (Nikki McKibbin, Tamyra Grey, and Ryan Starr, most notably) have enjoyed above struggling-musician-par success while failing to obtain any stick in the mainstream; while others have since languished in relative obscurity. (The RJ Helton fan-club forums boasts a whopping 269 members.)

So the results, based on season one of “American Idol”, would seem to indicate that “American Idol” is incapable of producing a music-star as much as a tv-star. The other four seasons, however, have proven that the definition of “American Idol” success is a moving target.

Season two of “American Idol” was an inversion of the previous season’s track-record. This time around it was the runner up, Clay Aiken, who would turn out to be the most successful season two contestant despite the almost universal loathing of his seeming awkwardness. Ruben Studdard, who was truly an underdog, won the contest but his career quickly sputtered. Ruben’s debut album was released several weeks after Clay’s, both on the “American Idol” label, and despite hitting #1 sold about 200,000 less than the runner ups disk in its first week. Critics have criticized Studdard for not having the stamina to carry a full set concert.

Season three of “American Idol” marked another milestone for the show: the first time a non-contestant achieved fame from a failed audition. Billed as the worst audition of the season, William Hung’s oddly spastic dancing and atonal singing became a viral sensation on the internet and Hung went on to establish a notable career as a parody of himself. Season three winner Fantasia Barrino, amongst some of the other contestants, finally brought legitimacy to the idea that “American Idol” brought in contestants with true musical talent. Despite universal praise, Barrino has yet to nail pop-star status but the story of her life and early challenges has become an inspiration to many.

Season four and five of “American Idol” seemed to see a redefinition of the “X” factor. Gradually, as the show transitioned from season to season, the criticism of “American Idol” scooping out the Barbie’s and Ken’s of the world began to recede as it became clear the voting populace was more open minded about issues like weight, age, and looks. If you were to favor the contestants on aesthetics alone, you’d often end up backing a short term contestant. It seemed the “X” factor was indeed as elusive as its namesake would imply.

“American Idol” has yet to present a success which has not struggled with the halo of their made-for-tv roots, and the numbers show that for all those votes a small percentage of supporters are actually going out to buy albums. ‘Can you capture the “X” factor’ seems to blend with the question of ‘can you create the “X” factor’. Despite seemingly marginal success in its intended purpose, however, “American Idol” remains the #1 fascination with television fans every season it airs. One can only wonder if that was the goal all along.

So, if you want to find out more information about American Idol or especially about Former American Idols, please visit this link BuddyTV Television

Related Information of Interest:

More things I have learned
Growing old does have one benefit ... experience. So, I am continuing here to share my vast pool of knowledge. Of course my girlfriend can't resist telling me I need to clean the pool, but heres the list anyway.

1. If you do anything that gets your hands wet, soapy or dirty, your nose WILL itch.

2. When you give your email out anywhere on the internet, you will soon learn all you never wanted to know about body part enhancements.

3. A cat does not love you. It simply allows you to live with it IF you pet, feed and clean it's litter box on a regular basis. Otherwise, you're history.

4. Your Co-Workers, on the other hand, DO love you ... at least as long as you continue to give them good stuff to talk about when you aren't around.

5. You are NOT the master of your fate. Your mother is. And when you get married, your wife is.

6. Life is beautiful .. Life sucks ... life is beautiful ... life sucks. Repeat as necessary.

7. There is a chip in all cars that keeps them from starting unless you stroke the dashboard correctly and sincerely mean it when you say "Come on baby .. you can do it".

8. Computers will only work correctly when you DON'T need them to.

9. A kiss is just a kiss, and a smile is just a smile, but a baby is forever.

10. There is no such thing as a ghost that can haunt you ... except in your own mind.

11. Nothing is carved in stone ... other than what will happen if you forget your other half's birthday or anniversary.

12. No matter how hard you try, you will NEVER be able to fold laundry according to your spouse's instructions.

13. Anything you think will happen, won't... and anything you think won't happen, will.

14. Love is a two way street .. unless you are on the freeway and then there may be lots of exits before you get somewhere.

You can see more of Jan Michaels musings or various and sundry humorous items at: Articles Heaven Or, Free Heaven

Meet Bryan Singer: Superman Returns
It must have been fate that Bryan Singer would direct the new film Superman Returns, the fifth in the series of Superman films. Singer loved the George Reeves Superman TV series when he was young, and was a huge fan of the Dick Donner-directed films from the 70s and 80s that starred Christopher Reeves as the Man of Steel. “I identify with Superman. I am adopted, I am an only child, and I love the idea that he comes from another world, that he's the ultimate immigrant. He has all these extraordinary powers, and he has a righteousness about him,“ said Bryan.

After attending the School Of Visual Arts in New York City (but not graduating), he graduated from the USC cinema school (where, incidentally, he met John Ottman who wrote the score for Superman Returns), Singer’s first commercial success was as the producer/director of The Usual Suspects in 1995.That film saw him work with Kevin Spacey for the first time, and Singer and Spacey are re-united, again in Superman Returns, as Spacey plays arch villain Lex Luther, just out of prison and again set to rule the world.

However, it is as an adapter of comic books, bringing superheroes to life, that Singer has carved a niche for himself in the movie world.

In 2000, as writer and director, he introduced Wolverine, Magneto and the rest of the X-Men to the movie world in a hugely successful adaptation, before reprising the characters in the follow-up, X2. Singer left the X-Men franchise to develop Superman Returns and did not work on the 3rd film The Last Stand.

Now an established player in Hollywood with a number of big projects lined up for the future, who would bet against his favourite being the recently-announced sequel for Superman Returns in 2009?

Filmography

Superman Returns (2006) (producer/director/writer)
X2 (2003) (executive producer/director/writer)
X-Men (2000) (director/writer)
Apt Pupil (1998) (producer/director)
Burn (1998) (executive producer)
The Usual Suspects (1995) (producer/director)
Public Access (1993) (executive producer/director/writer)
Lion's Den (1988) (director)

Niall is a huge fan of the original Superman film, and is looking forward to the release of Superman Returns. For news and information about the new film visit his site at www.SupermanReturnsNews.com. All rights reserved. Copyright www.SupermanReturnsNews.com.

Article Marketing for Search Engine Traffic
There are sites on the net that serve tons of traffic everyday. Traffic you wish you had, right?
The web is made up of billions of links, much like a spiderï¿½s web but on a larger scale. Search engines spider the web looking for new content to add to their massive databases so they can rank how relevant it is to particular search phrases.
What are the search engines looking for?
New content! In order for any search engine to provide relevant results to their visitors (so their visitors will repeatedly use them) they must provide the best results possible for every search performed on their site.
The best search engine gets more traffic and more traffic means more advertising money for them - so search engines have to be up to date to stay competitive in their market.
The big sites on the net, people, who have page rankings of 5 upwards, obviously serve a ton of visitors per day, provide search engines with a mass of links to follow and index. Thatï¿½s why they go back to the big sites more often than the little ones.
High traffic, very popular sites are visited by the search engine robots more often than sites with little traffic. Some large sites are visited by search engines as much as 2-4 times per month.
How can article marketing increase your search engine traffic?
By submitting articles you can get links from these high traffic sites. Furthermore you can optimize your articles with your search terms to get high rankings for that particular page. This would otherwise take weeks on a new site as oppose to a well established one such as this.
Each of these sites will have its own resource area, at the end of the article, writers include a bit of Author information on where to find out more about them. Place your website link in here and bobï¿½s your uncle the search engines will find your site through that link.
The more articles you submit with your website link in them, the more pages on the net you have pointing to you from high traffic sites and the better your ranking and link popularity.
Many good article sites these days create RSS feeds for each category. This provides an additional opportunity to market your site and article to people who subscribe to the feeds.
Start submitting your articles today. You will be amazed at the results they yield.

Richard is the Publisher of Articleprobe a Free Article Distribution and Submisssion Service. Set up your account today and start submitting your articles to Articleprobe